« Time of Introspection | Main | CLAUDINE: Confessions of an Economic Hit Man »

Comments

Tony

I bought the book the day after reading this interview and enjoyed it greatly. To be perfectly honest, it was the promise of reading more about the mysterious Claudine that was the real impetus. Many of Democracy Now's listeners are familiar with the role of IMF and World Bank loan adjusters, but Claudine! She seems the be the source of the EHM term and no one else but you uses it after that. Even the men who replaced you were able to operate without any knowledge of it. This makes the lack of detail about her a real challenge to the reader.

Who was she and why did she tell you anything? The system could have, would have, and did operate without her characterization of your work. If she were an intelligence operative, it would have been unlikely that she would have told you more than you needed to know, namely, that by inflating estimates, MAIN would get more work. Telling a tutee everything makes it more likely, not less likely, that he'll defect.

It's in fact the lucidity that she imparts to you that ultimately leads you to write the book. She would have predicted that given enough tutees, one would blow the whistle sooner or later. So Claudine becomes even more mysterious.

Equally mysterious is the fact that Claudine does not resurface after it becomes obvious that you have befriended Torrijos and neglected your role as EHM.

Would you provide the missing detail in your blog, or perhaps explain why you cannot?

John Perkins

Tony,
Thanks for you comment and question. See my latest post.
John Perkins

The comments to this entry are closed.