« Reflections on MEANINGFUL VALUES | Main | FEAR of FLYING »

Comments

Sandra Vieira

This article made me think of 'Kaizen'.

From Wikipedia: 'Kaizen' (改善, Japanese for "change for the better" or "improvement"; the English translation is "continuous improvement" or "continual improvement").

The original kanji characters for this word are: 改善

In Japanese this is pronounced 'kaizen'. 改 ('kai') means'change' or 'the action to correct' 善 ('zen') means 'good'.

In Chinese this is pronounced 'gai shan':

改善 ('gǎi shàn') means 'change for the better' or 'improve'.

改 ('gǎi') means 'change' or 'the action to correct'.

善 ('shàn') means 'good' or 'benefit'.
'Benefit' is more related to the Taoist or Buddhist philosophy, which gives the definition as the action that 'benefits' the society but not one particular individual (i.e. multilateral improvement). In other words, one cannot benefit at another's expense. The quality of benefit that is involved here should be sustained forever, in other words the 'shan' is an act that truly benefits others.

Authentic leadership and meaningful innovation MUST incorporate the fundamental principle of 'kaizen'(改善).

Alex Pattakos

Thank you for your very interesting post in which you link the Japanese concept of Kaizen to authentic leadership and meaningful innovation. Your conception is definitely in alignment with my own thinking on the subject, although my experience with the practice of Kaizen in organizations over the years has not been so profound. I think that the "modern" view of "continuous improvement" is short-sighted and marginalizes this concept's true significance. Looking for quick fixes, I'm afraid that many organizations have lost sight of the deeper meanings that you have outlined.

Let me also underscore that my references to "authentic leadership" (including "authentic living") and "meaningful innovation," while they certainly do incorporate the fundamental principle of Kaisen along the lines that you have suggested, go well beyond, i.e., transcend, such a conception. In this regard, both "authenticity" and "meaning" are rooted in the notion of "spirit" and therefore, while they certainly incorporate both the Japanese and Chinese principles in your post, also transcend them by moving the change process to a uniquely metaphysical level. The process of dialogue, for instance, is not only a vehicle for developing shared "meaning" (a la David Bohm), but also is a manifestation of accessing a common pool of spirit (in Greek, the "logos"). Hence, authentic dialogue enables (and engages) individuals to acknowledge that they each are part of a greater whole, that they naturally resonate with others within this whole, and that the whole is greater than the sum of its various parts. I would argue that the role of authentic leadership and meaningful innovation is to ensure that this kind of dialogic communication takes place in order to effect the change process in truly "meaningful" ways.

Thanks again for your excellent post!
Meaningfully,
Alex

The comments to this entry are closed.